Andrew Miller
This month, we turn our attention to the 2011 Costa book
of the year, and the intense drama of ‘Pure.’
On the front cover, the reader is captivated by the pistachio-coloured
cloak, worn by the protagonist, Jean-Baptiste Barratte, as he seeks to find his
place in the heart of Paris. This is an
historical novel, based around the overflowing Cemetery of les Innocents. The task is a macabre one; to dig out the
heart of the city’s cemetery in order to begin to bring life back into the
heart of Paris.
This is
pre-Revolutionary France; a place of decadence and poverty. Our hero meets both the best and the worst of
Parisienne society, and crucially for the time, suffers for his art. An engineer by trade, Baptiste embodies
someone struggling to create a new society, whilst the very foundations on which
life is built collapse beneath him.
Pure has been critically reviewed, with many critics
noting its use of language and descriptions.
It is not an easy read, and some readers may well find the closing scene
frustrating. However, it is a
beautifully written book with plenty to discuss with others.
Questions for discussion:
This novel was awarded the 2011 Costa Book of the
Year. To what extent does an award or
recommendation affect your decision to read a book?
The novel is set in 1785, just before the French
Revolution. How does this context affect
the story?
Some people have suggested that the Cemetery is a parable
for change and revolution.
·
In what ways might this be true?
·
How do the different characters interact with
the cemetery (as fact or as metaphor?)
·
How does the writer help the reader engage with
the shifting context?
What is ‘Pure’ about the novel, if anything? Why is the title so important for this novel?
Jean-Baptiste accepts his commission without
flinching. How does the exhumation of a
cemetery make you feel? Why? What do you think about Jean-Baptiste’s task?
Monsiuer Saint-Meard is the church organist. What part does he play throughout the novel?
As the burden of the destruction of the cemetery bears
down on Jean-Baptiste, Lecoeur consoles him with the words that ‘tomorrow will
break our hearts.’
·
Why does Jean-Baptiste insist that ‘tomorrow
will be easier.’
·
Who is right?
Why?
Doctor Guillotin is very clinical when it comes to
dealing in death.
·
Why are some of the characters revulsed and
silent by this?
·
How do you respond to death?
·
Why are we afraid to talk about death?
The final act of the book involves the gutting of a
church.
·
What did the miners and Jean-Baptiste save?
·
What would you save? Why?
Jean-Baptiste is a character in contradiction. He walks the line between traditional and
modern, rational and religious.
·
How do you respond to this?
·
In what ways is this contradictory nature a
barrier understanding the character?
There are a number of gritty and macabre scenes in the
novel.
·
What do they add to the narrative?
·
What elements of light are there in the book?
·
Which do you respond to positively? Which are more difficult to reconcile? Why?
In what ways does this novel help you engage with your
own choices and mortality? Why?
No comments:
Post a Comment